Choosing Between Visual Studio and VS Code as a .NET Developer
Visual Studio and Visual Studio Code are both first-class citizens in the .NET ecosystem, but they solve slightly different problems.
Visual Studio is a traditional, full-featured IDE with deep integration across the Microsoft stack. VS Code is a lightweight,
cross-platform editor that becomes powerful through extensions and the dotnet CLI.
If you are building modern ASP.NET Core APIs, worker services, Blazor frontends or cloud-native microservices,
you can be productive in both tools. The key question is not “which is better?” but
“which is better for this team, project and machine at this moment?”. This article walks through the strengths,
trade-offs and concrete scenarios so you can make intentional choices instead of defaulting to whatever was installed first.
Where Visual Studio Shines for .NET Workloads
Visual Studio is designed for large solutions and opinionated workflows. It understands .sln and .csproj files deeply,
offers powerful refactoring, and bundles rich tooling such as test explorers, performance profilers and GUI designers.
For teams that rely heavily on visual tooling and integrated diagnostics, this often becomes the main environment.
Typical use cases where Visual Studio is hard to beat include:
- Large, multi-project enterprise solutions with hundreds of projects and shared libraries.
- Legacy .NET Framework applications that use designers, WebForms, WCF or older project systems.
- Heavy debugging sessions that involve multiple processes, attach scenarios or remote debugging.
- Profiling CPU and memory, viewing timelines and optimizing performance in a visual way.
- Deep integration with SQL Server, Azure services and test management tooling.
Visual Studio also hides a lot of complexity for new developers. Project templates set up the right SDK,
dependencies and launch profiles automatically, which is ideal when you are still learning the structure
of ASP.NET Core applications or background workers.
Where VS Code Shines for .NET Development
VS Code takes the opposite approach: it gives you a fast, minimal editor and leaves most magic to extensions and the command line.
For developers who are comfortable with the dotnet CLI, Git and terminal workflows, this leads to a very efficient
development loop. VS Code is also ideal on lower-spec machines or when working in containers and remote environments.
Common scenarios where VS Code works extremely well:
- Building minimal APIs and microservices where each service lives in its own small repository.
- Working cross-platform across Windows, macOS and Linux with a consistent experience.
- Editing infrastructure-as-code files such as Dockerfiles, YAML pipelines and Kubernetes manifests.
- Remote development via SSH or dev containers, where the code and runtime live in the cloud.
- Quickly reviewing pull requests, doing small fixes and running unit tests without opening a full IDE.
When combined with the official C# extension and debugger, VS Code can set breakpoints, step through your code,
inspect variables and watch expressions. You lose some visual tooling, but you gain a very responsive environment
that stays out of the way.
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Builder;
using Microsoft.Extensions.Hosting;
var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args);
// Add services
builder.Services.AddEndpointsApiExplorer();
builder.Services.AddSwaggerGen();
var app = builder.Build();
if (app.Environment.IsDevelopment())
{
app.UseSwagger();
app.UseSwaggerUI();
}
app.MapGet("/api/status", () =>
{
return Results.Ok(new
{
ok = true,
message = "API is running",
timestamp = DateTimeOffset.UtcNow
});
});
app.Run();
This kind of minimal API project works very well in VS Code: it is easy to scaffold with
dotnet new webapi, debug via launch configurations, and containerize with a simple Dockerfile.
Solution-Based vs Folder-Based Workflows
Visual Studio prefers solution-based workflows. You typically open a .sln file,
which groups multiple projects, test assemblies and tooling settings. The IDE then builds and runs everything
with awareness of project dependencies, shared configurations and solution-wide analyzers.
VS Code is more “folder-based”. You open the folder containing your project and let the C# extension and
dotnet CLI figure out the rest. This is convenient when you practice a micro-repository style,
where each service, library or tool lives in its own repository with just a few projects.
{
"version": "0.2.0",
"configurations": [
{
"name": "Launch .NET API",
"type": "coreclr",
"request": "launch",
"preLaunchTask": "build",
"program": "${workspaceFolder}/bin/Debug/net8.0/MyApi.dll",
"args": [],
"cwd": "${workspaceFolder}",
"stopAtEntry": false,
"serverReadyAction": {
"action": "openExternally",
"pattern": "\\bNow listening on:\\s+(https?://\\S+)"
}
}
]
}
In Visual Studio, a lot of this configuration is generated and maintained for you through the project system.
In VS Code you manage these files directly, which offers more transparency at the cost of a little more setup.
Team Scenarios and Real-World Recommendations
Most teams do not have a single, uniform answer to “which IDE should we use?”. Instead, different personas
naturally gravitate toward different tools:
- Backend-heavy developers often prefer Visual Studio for profiling, complex debugging and solution-wide refactoring.
- Cloud and DevOps engineers often prefer VS Code for working with YAML, Terraform, Bicep and Docker files.
- Developers on macOS or Linux will almost always choose VS Code because full Visual Studio is Windows-only.
- Developers who pair program frequently may mix both: one in Visual Studio, one in VS Code, synced over Git.
The key is to make sure your build, test and deployment processes do not depend on a specific IDE.
Use the dotnet CLI, CI pipelines and infrastructure scripts as the source of truth. Then,
Visual Studio and VS Code simply become different windows into the same, reliable workflow.
How to Decide for Your Next .NET Project
A good rule of thumb is to choose Visual Studio when you need deep, integrated tooling and you are primarily on Windows,
and choose VS Code when you care more about speed, cross-platform workflows and working close to the command line.
For many developers, the best answer is “both”:
- Start new APIs and microservices in VS Code to keep projects lean and transparent.
- Use Visual Studio when diagnosing tricky bugs, analyzing performance, or working on massive solutions.
- Standardize on the
dotnet CLI so the project builds cleanly regardless of the IDE.
Over time you will naturally build an intuition: “this task feels like a Visual Studio job” or
“this change is faster in VS Code”. As long as you keep your pipelines and architecture IDE-agnostic,
you are free to use whichever tool helps you ship reliable .NET software with the least friction.